Abridgement of "The Impending Great Chastisement" — Part
III
The "New" Cold
War
By Father Paul Kramer, B.Ph., S.T.B., M.Div., S.T.L.
(Cand.)
In 1989, the ‘Party
Line’1 was decreed from the Vatican Secretariat of State:
"The Consecration of Russia was done in 1984" — notwithstanding the
fact that no consecration of Russia has been performed by any Pope since Pope
Pius XII in 1952. The 1952 consecration was performed by the Pope alone,
without the participation of all the bishops, and therefore did not fulfill the
request of Our Lady of Fatima.
In order to lend some
credibility to the lie, it has been constantly asserted by the fundamentalistic
adherents of the Vatican Party Line that Russia has converted, or is at least
well into the process of conversion.
The evidence of the alleged
‘conversion’ consists of such things as the fall of the Berlin Wall
and the subsequent ‘collapse’ of Communism in Eastern Europe and the
‘disintegration’ of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Cold War was now
declared to be ‘over’. The West had won (or so it was made to
appear). Communism was defeated (but Russia was still very much allied with the
Communist nations). ‘Democratic’ Russia had entered a partnership
with the United States, now (falsely) perceived as the only superpower on the
planet. The ‘Civilization of Love’ was loudly proclaimed — and
Fatima could be safely relegated to the past along with other such museum
pieces as the Soviet Union, the Berlin Wall and the Cold War.
With the ‘end’ of
the Cold War, former adversaries could now disarm and join forces against
‘rogue states’, ‘bad actors’, proliferators of Weapons of
Mass Destruction (WMD) and promoters of terrorism. No global cataclysm need be
feared anymore: the "period of history," declared Mons. (now Cardinal) Tarcisio
Bertone, "marked by tragic human lust for power and evil" had been "brought to
an end."
Russia’s War
Games
On February 17, 2004, the
Russian defense analyst Pavel Felgenhauer announced in the Russian daily,
The Moscow Times: "The Russian military has begun a strategic exercise
heralded as the biggest since Soviet times. The war game," continued Mr.
Felgenhauer, "is very Soviet in style and content, acting out a possible
confrontation with the United States and its allies." Felgenhauer then asks a
very legitimate question:
"Putin constantly states
that Russia has chosen the path of democracy and market economic reforms, so
why spend money preparing to fight a nuclear war with the Western democracies
...?"
The answer to this question is
truly frightening and is completely foreign to the ‘managed
perception’ foisted on the public by the mass media controlled by the
powers that be: what President Eisenhower called the ‘military industrial
complex’ and what Lenin referred to as the ‘commanding
heights’.
I have already pointed out in
the first installment of this series that there has emerged a "New Axis" of
nations aligned against the United States and its allies. The New Axis is a
Moscow-Beijing Axis, and its existence is well known at the cabinet level of
the U.S. government.2
China - Russia
Friendship Treaty
In July 2001 Russia and China
signed the Chinese-Russian Friendship Treaty and openly declared their joint
strategic interests against the United States. At this point we can
rephrase Mr. Felgenhauer’s question thus: "If Russia has really chosen the
path of democracy and market economic reforms, then …
Why does Russia align itself with the Communist
powers against the United States while preparing to fight a nuclear war with
the Western democracies ...?
The first and most fundamental
consideration to be made in this regard is that the ‘collapse of the
Soviet Union’ was very carefully planned in advance by the Communist Party
of the Soviet Union. Christopher Story points out that the apparent
‘collapse’ of Communism was not a collapse, "but rather that the
Soviets had dismantled the Stalinist model and had restored in its place a
long-planned, updated, regalvanized, Leninist World Revolutionary
model."3
This was plainly admitted by
Lt.-General Alexander Lebed, quoted by Itar-Tass, the Russian Communist
news agency on August 19, 1994, who described the ‘dramatic event’
foretold by Gorbachev as …
"a brilliantly planned and executed, large-scale,
unprecedented provocation in which the roles were scripted for the intelligent
and the stupid, all of whom consciously or unconsciously played their
parts."4
Accordingly, therefore, in
June 1995 Oleg Poptsov, Director of the Second National TV Channel, told the
Obshchaya Gazeta: "We should not forget that the representatives of the
former political system have all adapted beautifully to the new economic
situation. They are in banking. They were the first to understand all the
positive sides of a system of government controlled capitalism. They
were very good organizers, and they were pioneers in commercializing the
country."5
‘They’, were the
specially retrained ‘former’ officers of the KGB and GRU who, as
Story points out, "seized control of the economy and the financial system in
1990-91."
Thus President Vladimir Putin,
former head of the Soviet secret police declared in his ‘Cheka’
(forerunner of the dreaded KGB) Speech of December 20, 2001 that, "the main
result of the security services’ work over the last decade is that they
have become an organic part of the democratic government, its natural and
necessary component."
Thus, Story concludes
logically: "this admission confirms what can easily be established by reviewing
the pedigrees of key personnel on the Moscow political stage — Namely,
that the Russian government is ‘directed’, and has been ‘taken
over’ by, the intelligence services" which remain Soviet and
Communist.6
Communism in the mind of Marx
and Lenin is the outcome of the dialectical process (a process that seems to go
in opposite directions — first to the right, then to the left, but ends up
going in the direction the Marxists want) of world revolution. When the Western
powers will have finally been definitively vanquished by the
‘progressive’ forces of world Communist revolution then there will be
‘peace’, which is identical in the Marxist mind to the domination of
the world by Communism.
Communist Victory
Communist "Peace"
In a TV interview on the
program, Fatima: "The Moment Has Come", U.S. Army General Daniel Graham
related that once he was talking in Moscow with a Soviet officer on the subject
of ‘peace’. The Soviet officer asked him, "Don’t you want
peace?" General Graham answered, "No! I know what you mean by peace."
Just at that moment their car passed a huge billboard on which was depicted an
armed soldier of the Soviet Red Army. Under the picture was the caption which
read: "Pobieda kommunista eta mir" (Communist victory is peace).
The ‘useful idiots’
(as Lenin called them) of the liberal leftist media characterize the view that
the Communist is wholly dedicated to world revolution as a paranoid expression
of ‘anti-Communist hysteria’, but it remains the most fundamental
‘dogma’ of Marxist doctrine that Communism must and will conquer the
world. Thus, Mikhail Gorbachev declared in November 1987,
"We are
moving toward a new world, the world of Communism. We shall never turn off
that road."7
The ‘changes’ in
Soviet Russia must be understood according to what Gorbachev called the
Leninist ‘method of dialectical cognition’. Yelena Bonner, widow of
the late Andrei Sakharov, a well known Russian anti-Communist dissident,
explains a key to understanding all Communist/Leninist/Marxist statements as
follows:
"The point is that the
Communist goal is fixed and changeless — it never varies one iota
from their objective of world domination, but if we judge them by the
direction in which they seem to be going, we shall be
deceived."8
The ‘collapse of
Communism’ and the ‘demise’ of the ‘former’ Soviet
Union were staged events of the Leninist world revolution, planned decades in
advance.
The Buorgeoisie will
Have to be Put to Sleep
Dimitri Manuilski foretold the
‘changes’ in the Soviet Union as long ago as 1930, and he explained
the purpose of those changes:
"The buorgeoisie will
have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most
spectacular peace movement on record. There will be electrifying overtures and
unheard of concessions. The Capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will
rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance
to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we will smash them with our
clenched fist."9
Gorbachev, accordingly, just
as the immediate preparations were being made for the ‘changes’,
declared to the Politburo (supreme ruling body of the Communist regime in the
Soviet Union):
"Gentlemen, Comrades, do not be concerned about all
you hear about ‘glasnost’ and ‘perestroika’
and democracy in the coming years. There will be no
significant change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes.
Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and to let them fall
asleep."10
Gorbachev emphasized the
Leninist revolutionary nature of the cosmetic
‘changes’ on May 17, 1990 when he declared:
"even when people all around me are shouting
‘chaos, chaos, chaos’, and ‘collapse,
collapse’, I believe as Lenin said, that this
revolutionary chaos may yet crystalize into new forms of life … . WE HAVE
STARTED ON THE LAST LAP."11
The last lap of the
Communist world Revolution that is.12
It began with the October
Revolution followed by Lenin’s New Economic Policy, which in
turn was followed by Stalin’s Socialism in one Country followed by
Khrushchev’s Peaceful Co-existence, followed by Brezhnev’s
Detente, followed by Gorbachev’s perestroika, the immediate
preparation for the new Russian democratism. This is the present
system of managed democracy in Russia today, which is in reality the
implementation of Lenin’s New Economic Policy on a grander scale.
This Soviet policy aims to replace the dictatorship of the
proletariat with the state of the whole people, which is the
final stage before the imposition of Communism on the whole world.
In his book, Perestroika,
New Thinking for our Country and the World, Gorbachev
places special emphasis on the Leninist period: "the works of Lenin and his
ideals of socialism remained for us an inexhaustible source of creative
thought, theoretical wealth and political astuteness … it is instructive
that it [the Leninist period] proved the strength of Marxist-Leninist
dialectics, the conclusions of which are based on an analysis of the actual
historical situation."13
Christopher Story explains
that the ‘actual historical situation’ that Gorbachev refers to "was
the remarkably successful ‘New Economic Policy’ strategic deception
devised by Lenin", which "hoodwinked the West into believing that the Leninist
revolutionaries had scaled back or abandoned their Communist
ideology."14 As a result of this Leninist deception, the New York
Times announced on page one of its August 13, 1921 issue: "Lenin abandons
state ownership as Soviet policy".
Seventy years later, Story
points out, "on 26th July, 1991, The New York Times
prematurely announced the ‘death of Communism’ on the front
page for a second time". The "second time round," Story explains, "the KGB
needed to go to special lengths to organize the globally publicized
‘August coup’ provocation, code named Golgotha — to provide a
‘convincing’ pretext for the appearance of the abandonment of
Communism, the reported banning of the Communist Party of the Soviet
Union (CPSU), and the subsequent controlled ‘collapse’ of the
Soviet Union."15 The KGB code name Golgotha blasphemously alludes to
the future ‘resurrection’ of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
The process of that ‘resurrection’ is presently in progress.
Writing from Russia, the
Russian defense analyst Pavel Felgenhauer explains in his September 11, 2003
column in The Moscow Times, that "the post-Sept. 11 world seemed to
offer an opportunity for a true equal partnership with America …
Washington should turn to the UN and act with other countries, paying special
respect to Russia."
"Of course," Felgenhauer
continues, "there were skeptics in the Russian military and intelligence
communities that never trusted the Americans, who believed the United States
will always be an enemy — the center of world evil and Zionism."
The Bush regime, it seems, has
made every possible effort to prove the Russian skeptics correct. Felgenhauer
says that these skeptics were angrily muttering behind the scenes: "The Yanks
say they’ve moved into Central Asia ‘temporarily,’ but
they’ll stay and it is us who will be forced out step by step."
"Today," Felgenhauer
continues, "after so many U.S. unilateral actions, these skeptics seem to be in
the process of taking over Russia’s domestic and foreign policy
decision-making completely. The turning point", he says, "was Iraq". "The
intelligence and military lobby — the chekists and siloviki —
pressed for Russia to oppose America adamantly … the chekists’ [KGB
Secret Police] power inside the Kremlin continued to increase." In early
September, the "well informed Kremlin spin doctor Gleb Pavlovsky publicly
acknowledged that the chekists and siloviki are close to taking over power in
Russia."
The chekists were never out of
power, however, since they were the ones who actually carried out the
pre-scripted ‘changes’ which brought about the ‘collapse’
of the Soviet Union. However, the consummation of ‘operation
Golgotha’ is now at hand. The chekists and siloviki, the Soviet hardliners
who are now directly taking over the reins of power, want, as Felgenhauer
explains, "the restoration of ‘Great Russia,’ Soviet-style — a
rigid authoritarian police state with a state run economy, xenophobic,
anti-American and anti-Semitic."
Russia Prepares for War
with U.S.
The new Cold War is already in
full swing while Soviet Russia prepares for war with the United States.
The Soviet government notified the U.S. that its mid-February 2004
maneuvers would be an exercise, describing it as "part of efforts to fend off
terror threats even though it imitates the Cold War scenario of an all-out
war."16 Ivan Safranchuk, head of the Moscow office of the Center
for Defense Information said, "The exercise follows the old scenario, and
casting it as anti-terror is absurd."17 A Moscow Times
editorial says that it is "a little alarming" that the Kremlin simulates a
nuclear war, but "what is more alarming is that the Russian commanders, though
they would not admit it in public …
continue to believe that a nuclear exchange between
the United States and Russia is possible and thus that they should plan for
it. Sadly, the situation is the same with U.S.
commanders."18
Putin has announced that some
SS-19s will be in operation until 2030 — "It is not a good omen,"
Felgenhauer concludes.
Tension continues to build
between the Cold War rivals: "U.S.-Russian relations," says Vladimir
Issachenkov, have "soured over Moscow’s criticism of the war in Iraq, U.S.
concerns about authoritarian trends in the Kremlin’s domestic policy and
Russia’s perceived attempts to assert its authority over ex-Soviet
neighbors."19
On Monday, January
26th, U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell issued a strong warning
on the state of Russian ‘democracy’ when he declared: "Russia’s
democratic system, it seems to us, has yet to find the necessary balance
between executive, legislative and judicial branches of power … Political
power is not yet fully tied to the law." Well, as Bill Clinton might say, "It
all depends on how you define democracy."
Sergei Markov, director of the
Institute of Political Studies and chairman of the Civic Committee on
Foreign Affairs, explains in his essay, The Future of Managed Democracy,
that "there are three teams in the Kremlin … None of them are opposed
to democracy, but each understands democracy in its own way." Markov
elaborates: "The St. Petersburg chekists," [Putin is a St. Petersburg chekist],
"hold themselves responsible for restoring Russia to greatness …
They’re all for democracy so long as it helps them to achieve their
goal: great-power status. When it hinders them, democracy must be
curtailed."20
Markov gives an example: "On
occasion that means trampling the interests of a self-serving minority —
in order to neutralize the ambitions of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, whom the chekists
view as a threat to the welfare of the state."
Khodorkovsky was viewed as a
"threat to the welfare of the state" by the chekists precisely because he was a
threat to them. He was financing opposition parties. Ivan Rybkin was
another example. Rybkin, the man who was the opposition contender, was abducted
in mid-February and was missing for several days. On his return, he was visibly
shaken and dropped out of the election race against Putin. He was an
insignificant presidential candidate, but he campaigned against Vladimir Putin
so vehemently and so articulately expressing his personal attacks, that he had
to be neutralized.
Markov also explains, "Putin
believes firmly in the rule of law. One’s enemies have to be crushed, of
course, but only within the framework of the law." Again, it all depends on how
you define law — Lenin defined it as "the exercise of absolute power
limited by nothing." It is that Leninist ‘rule of law’ that
Soviet Russia intends to forcibly impose on the whole world.
Spiritually
Bankrupt
The New World Order of
the Capitalist world cannot save the world from Communist enslavement: it is
the creation of Freemasonry and the order it would impose on the world
is substantially identical to Communism.21 The leading
Communist revolutionaries who created the Communist world, as Manfred Adler
documents,22 were Freemasons — Communism is the creation of
Freemasonry. The struggle between the two is the struggle between the "Evil
Empire" and "the Great Satan". We cannot look to the West to save the world
from the ‘Red Dragon’, only to be devoured by the ‘Black
Dragon’ because Soviet Communism and the American imposition of the
New World Order are in reality the selfsame Masonic
Beast.23
The corrupt and decadent West
has been drained of its spiritual lifeblood, which is faith in Jesus Christ.
America cannot save the world — it cannot even save itself. The
‘American Century’ was the last century, and America, spiritually
bankrupt, is now in full and rapid decline as it sinks in its own ocean of
moral decay: abortion, divorce, contraception, gay marriage, gay rights,
pornography, etc.; the titanic superpower suffers the fate of the Titanic.
America’s glory is the glory of the past.
The great nation of Russia,
however, has been designated by God to be a ‘vessel of election’,
which God intends to use as His chosen instrument to destroy the Masonic
Beast — The New World Order. Russia’s time has come,
and that is why Our Lady of Fatima has requested that Russia be
consecrated:
"The moment has come in
which God asks the Holy Father to make, and to order that in union with
him and at the same time, all the bishops of the world make the consecration of
Russia to My Immaculate Heart, promising to save it by this
means. ..."24
God commanded that St. Paul be
set apart and consecrated because he had been chosen by God to be a
‘vessel of election’ for the conversion of the nations. Before his
conversion, St. Paul was a persecutor of the Church. Russia has been a great
persecutor of the Church, but the moment has come for Russia to become
the vessel of election, the instrument in the hand of God to slay the
dragon, the Apocalyptic Beast. Russia will be given the power by God
to destroy the Godless New World Order only when that nation will
have been set apart like St. Paul and consecrated. Russia is chosen,
like David was chosen by God, but David was first consecrated, and then
went forth and slew the Philistine giant. But so long as God’s
request for that consecration remains unfulfilled, Russia remains an instrument
of wrath.
As Sister Lucy explained,
"Many times the Most Blessed
Virgin told my cousins Francisco and Jacinta as well as myself that Russia will
be the instrument of chastisement chosen by Heaven to punish the whole world
(for its sins) if we do not beforehand obtain the conversion of that poor
nation ..."25
Our Lady of Fatima said to
Sister Lucy in May 1952,
"Make it known to the Holy
Father that I am always awaiting the Consecration of Russia to My Immaculate
Heart. Without the Consecration, Russia will not be able to convert, nor
will the world have peace."26
As we have seen at the
beginning of this article, Russia is publicly flexing its nuclear arms. U.S.
foreign policy, promoting their New World Order, has irritated the
Russian hardliners who are in power and who have emphatically stated,
"we’ve had enough!"
There is only one alternative
to this showdown — that is the consecration and conversion of Russia which
will lead to the stopping of the Masonic New World Order and the
conversion of the whole world to Jesus Christ.
The world is on the verge of
incalculable destruction: nuclear annihilation. God has promised that by
means of the act of the consecration of Russia, "by this means" Russia
will be saved and peace will be given to the world. The Pope, so far, has
chosen not to do the one thing, the one act by which God has
promised to save the world. The diabolical deception emanating from the
Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, is the lie that
Heaven’s request has already been fulfilled.
Cardinal Bertone, because he
believes Sodano’s (and his own) lie, is convinced there is nothing to
worry about since the "period of history marked by human lust for power and
evil" has been "brought to an end." There is, therefore, according to
them simply no danger of world war, no danger of nuclear annihilation
and no reason on earth to waste time worrying about God’s request for the
consecration of Russia. Greater folly can scarcely be conceived.
Pope John Paul II declared at
Fatima that, "the message of Fatima imposes an obligation on the Church."
In view of the incalculably catastrophic consequences of non-compliance
with Heaven’s request, Bishop Rudolf Graber declared that to ignore the
message and the requests of Our Lady of Fatima is tantamount to a "crime
against humanity." I dare not judge those Vatican courtiers who have
opposed Our Lady’s request for the Consecration of Russia and prevented
the Holy Father from fulfilling it; nevertheless — May God have
mercy on their souls.
continued...
Footnotes:
1. The Devil’s Final Battle, Chapter 8,
pp. 89ff.
2. On October 10, 2002, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul
Wolfowitz said, "The thing that came to all of us on the Rumsfeld Commission,
the greatest surprise, is to understand just how much these bad actors (New
Axis states) were helping one another, and moreover how much help was coming
from Russia and China."
3. Christopher Story, The European Union
Collective, London and New York, 2002, p. 7.
4. Ibid., p. 52.
5. Ibid., p. 63.
6. Victor Shenderovich, whose political satire program
Kukli (puppets) was removed from the air due to its less than respectful
portrayal of Vladimir Putin, said on the radio on February 27, that Putin has
reformed the economy by bringing in "the KGB and the Communists." The interview
can be found at: www.theconnection.org
7. Christopher Story, Ibid.,
p. 19
8. Ibid., p. 19.
9. Ibid., p. 35.
10. Ibid., p. 44.
11. Ibid., p. 49.
12. November 15, 1985, Gorbachev: "In the building of our
future we are basing ourselves upon … Marxism-Leninism ... through
restructuring [‘perestroika’ — ‘reformation’]
we want to give socialism a second wind." Ibid., p.
38.
13. Ibid., p. 53.
14. Ibid., p. 53.
15. Ibid., p. 53.
16. The Moscow Times, February 2, 2004.
17. "Military Planning New Exercises", in The Moscow
Times, February 2, 2004.
18. The Moscow Times, February 3, 2004.
19. The Moscow Times, February 2, 2004.
20. The Moscow Times, January 27, 2004.
21. c.f. Manfred Adler, Die Söhne der Finsternis:
Die Geplante Weltregierung.
22. Manfred Adler; Die Antichristliche
Revolution der Freimaurerei, Jestetten, 1983, p. 47.
23. For a fuller explanation of this, ask for
Father Kramer’s booklet, The Chastisement of the World
Foretold by Our Lady of Fatima.
24. Frère Michel de la Sainte Trinité,
The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. II, p. 555.
25. Frère Michel, The Whole Truth About
Fatima, Vol. III, The Third Secret, p. 505.
26. Cf. Il Pellegrinaggio Delle
Meraviglie, p. 440 (published under the auspices of the Italian
episcopate).
Return to
Table of Contents
|