|
 |
Why this Pall of Silence
Regarding Fatima?
by Bishop Rudolph Graber of Regensburg,
Germany
It has become more and more quiet with regard to everything that
pertains to Fatima. At least this is true for many areas of the world.
Nevertheless, truly Fatima-minded parishes still exist, parishes where the
people come together to pray the Rosary daily and where the 13th day of the
month (from May to October) is given special consideration.
Many Are Disappointed with Fatima
With what anticipation did not the people await the year 1960,
when the so-called "secret of Fatima" was supposed to be revealed! . . . But
nothing came of it, and hence people were disappointed. Actually, however,
these people overlooked something very important, for the Bishop of Fatima had
directed that a letter be sent to all the bishops of the world proposing that
the 13th of October (1960) be observed as a worldwide day of prayer and
penance. In many areas of the world, this appeal produced a hearty, responsive
echo. What shall we deduce from all this? If the bishop read Sister Lucy's
letter and found any predictions of disastrous nature, it is quite
understandable that he would then have appealed to the bishops of the world,
asking them to urge their faithful to prayer, and it could well be that the
disaster predicted was postponed through prayer and penance. For we know that
all predictions of impending punishment are contingent, that is, they will be
imposed only if there is no repentance. Was it not thus in the case of Nineveh
as described in the Bible? Jonas proclaimed the threat of punishment, but the
people repented and so that specific prediction did not occur. Many people have
acted just like Jonas, who was disturbed, since his role as prophet seemed to
be undermined. What he had loudly proclaimed as a certain occurrence was
thwarted by the penance of the Ninevites! Might not the present situation be
similar? Indeed, too great a number of people were interested only in what was
sensational connected with the Fatima message. When that failed to materialize
they lost interest.
 |
Pope Pius XII was consecrated Bishop on May 13, 1917 at the very hour Our Lady first appeared at Fatima. He was pleased to be called "The Pope of Our Lady of Fatima". He particularly promoted during his pontificate belief in the Message of Our Lady of Fatima. After his death the Vatican started its new Eastern European policy which culminated in the Vatican-Moscow Agreement. This agreement in effect caused many bishops to ignore and disobey Our Lady of Fatima. When Bishop Graber's talk was given the Vatican-Moscow Agreement was not widely known but its effects were already being felt. See "Pope John Paul II Fears Bishops' Open Rebellion" in this issue. |
A Second Group of People
A second group of people who have disregarded the Fatima message
were already characterized by Christ in these words: "Just as it was in the
days of Noe, so will it be in the day of visitation of the Son of Man. For just
as they continued to eat and drink, to marry and be given in marriage until the
day Noe entered the ark, paying no heed until the deluge came and engulfed
them, so shall it also be at the coming of the Son of Man." These are the
people who, in an age of economic well-being, cast all warnings to the winds
and exclaim: "Oh, why spread such gloomy predictions? No one today is
interested in another war. Everyone knows, both in the East and the West, that
there will be no victor in the next war, should anyone even be left alive at
all." But these people forget that there is someone very much interested in
driving mankind into another catastrophe, namely, satan. But it seems that no
one believes in his existence, nor in an abode called hell. Let us ask
ourselves whether we too have not also been somewhat taken in by such
foolishness.
A Third Group
A third group of people who want no part of Fatima are extensive
in number, and present themselves in various shades and categories.
To begin with, there exists the cliché: "It is only a
private revelation," with which Fatima is lightly brushed aside. It is attached
to everything connected with Fatima as a label. Any interest shown is countered
with: "Why this continual reference to Fatima? After all, it is merely private
revelation. I rely on the great biblical-apostolic revelation of God which
ended with the death of the last apostle. To what purpose, then, all the
commotion?"
Oh, yes, it is quite true that the great revelation of God ended
with Christ and the Apostles, but this does not mean that God may no longer
speak anywhere to us, His own people. Every communication from God is something
tremendous and something holy, whether it be directed to a prophet of the Old
Testament or to a peasant girl of our age, who can neither read nor write!
Moreover, did not the apostle Peter declare in his Pentecostal
sermon that the Holy Spirit will be poured out over all flesh, that sons and
daughters shall prophesy and that old men shall dream, and that even servants
and handmaids shall receive of this spirit? And if these things were not to
come to pass, what reliability would there be in the word of God?
Private revelations are merely instances of fulfillment of this
pentecostal promise, fulfillment also of the promise of Christ that He would be
with us all days, even unto the end of the world, fulfillment of the prophetic
words: "I shall make a covenant with them and shall not cease to do good things
for them."
A theologian of repute has furthermore pointed out that a
careful distinction should be made between personal revelations directed solely
toward the recipients of the message and those where the message is declared to
be for mankind at large. The former can with equanimity be ignored, but the
latter must be taken seriously, and Fatima belongs to this category.
If Russia Were Converted...
Is Fatima a matter of world concern or not? If Russia were
converted now, as the message promises, would this not largely solve the
political problems under which we suffer today? How many other difficulties
would not also be solved if the tremendous sums spent annually in East and West
for armaments would be used to alleviate the conditions of hunger and other
deprivations in the underdeveloped areas of the world!
Why do we not imitate the example of the Israelites, as related
in the Scriptures, when they caused the walls of Jericho to crumble through
their prayers? Why do we place our trust again and again all too exclusively in
diplomatic maneuvers and discussions and all sorts of political wishful
dreaming, instead of applying the full might of prayer to break down the walls
of separation here and throughout the world? All is possible to the man of
faith, Christ told us. Is this still true, or isn't it?
Among those in the fourth group are the proponents of an
exaggerated Christo-centrism, who believe that Christ must be kept all alone in
a foreground position . . . I have already quoted earlier a typical statement
made by one of them: "We don't need any woman receptionist. We go directly to
Christ."
Such a foolish and thoughtless statement indicates a lack of
appreciation of the close unity which exists between Jesus and Mary. Anyone who
has been on a Marian pilgrimage considers Confession and Holy Communion as a
matter of course - the high point of the pilgrimage. We object to being
classified as second class Christians because we are devotees of Mary. As a
matter of fact, we are the actual Christocentrists, because veneration of Mary
is ultimately directed to Christ, inasmuch as Her entire life and existence,
all Her thoughts and feelings, were always concerned with Her Child, Jesus
Christ, the Lord.
The Fifth Group
The fifth group, particularly to be mentioned in our present
day, are the hyper-liturgists. I wish to make it perfectly clear and
beyond all question that I most warmly welcome the liturgical developments of
our day, inasmuch as the Council has brought to fruition what we in our
youthful activities of the twenties already had considered to be one of the
most lofty goals to be achieved.
However, let us also face the evident fact that the use of the
vernacular instead of Latin and the definitive separation of the Liturgy of the
Word from that of the Eucharist has not brought good Catholics to church more
often. Moreover, this liturgical innovation has given little evidence of any
interior renewal, which was designated as the true aim of the Council.
The objective piety manifested in the Liturgy also requires a
subjective piety in union with it. Extra-liturgical prayer forms are also very
necessary, such as the Holy Rosary, Way of the Cross and the deeply moving,
humanly appealing Marian devotion.
It is high time that we also stop being irritated when our older
generation of people still seek satisfaction as they have done heretofore in
these forms ...
God is not limited to the purest liturgical forms. And have we
ever given serious thought to the lofty praise rendered to Mary in the Liturgy?
How often is Her name mentioned in the Mass, and how many feasts are designed
to honor Her precisely in virtue of the Liturgy? It is an absurdity to tear
apart today what God has joined together. Christ and Mary simply belong
together! And similarly also, the Liturgy and Mary!
The above groups are the main ones, though not the only ones,
which provide the basic reasons for the lack of appreciation for things Marian,
and particularly regarding Fatima, which is so prevalent today. But let us not
be dissuaded! We find ourselves in good company! None other than the Holy
Father himself (Paul VI) rendered a most eminent acknowledgment of Fatima, more
beautiful and profound than we might have wished, at the close of the Council,
climaxing his words by sending the Golden Rose to Fatima and renewing the
consecration of the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary ...
Living the Consecration Necessary
Mary has asked us to do many things of a prayerful nature at
Fatima, such as recitation of the Rosary, observing the First Saturdays of
Reparation, Consecration to Her Immaculate Heart. But She made it clear beyond
any doubt that the most important thing was the "metanoia," the conversion of
heart, repentance, or as the Council phrased it, interior renewal. Hence,
living the Consecration means living an exemplary Christian life, particularly
in its social, communal aspect, in a manifestation of kindness and generosity,
pursuing compassion, and forgiving love...
I close my discourse to you by recounting the noteworthy dream
of St. John Bosco, who saw two fleets engaged in combat on the high seas, one
being directed by the Pope. Two towers with lights then came forth from the
sea. Over one tower hovered the Immaculate, over the other hovered the
Eucharist. Those ships were saved which managed to reach safe harbor aided by
the guidance and protection afforded by the pathway between these two towers.
This dream has a great significance for our times and indicates to us where our
security lies - the Eucharist and the Mother of God! If we, too, direct our
ship of life between these towers, we shall surely reach safely the eternal
shore.
Excerpts from a discourse given by Bishop Rudolph Graber of
Regensburg, Germany in the Capuchin church of Vilsbiburg, on the 13th of June
1965, as recorded in the German publication Das Betende Volk, (The Praying
People).
Return to Table of Contents
|
|
Printer friendly
|
|