Pastors Must Teach The Whole Truth
The Pastoral Character of
The Second Vatican Council
Cardinal Silvio Oddi, Prefect of
the Sacred Congregation
for the Clergy
The following article was published in the English weekly
edition of the L'Osservatore Romano of 25 October, 1982. It was also
published more recently by Christ to the World in the September-October
1983 edition with the following introduction. As our readers may know,
CHRIST TO THE WORLD is published with the approval of the Catholic
Church authorities in Rome, CUM APPROBATIONE ECCLESTICA VICARIATUS.
'A modern shepherd who dares to attenuate the doctrine of Jesus
Christ on the pretext of conserving the quantitative presence of non-believers
within the sheepfold, has not understood the pastoral character of Vatican
Council II'.
Cardinal Oddi speaks with great frankness to us on a delicate
subject but one which is crucial for the future of the Church: the faithfulness
of priests to Him who called Himself the Good Shepherd.
It is unfortunately frequent today that pastors (priests,
professors, confessors, preachers, even bishops) give in to the temptation to
dilute the doctrine of Christ, to accommodate it to the views of modern man,
catering to his tastes and prejudices. They act this way sometimes fearing that
otherwise those Christians weak in faith would abandon the fold. The Cardinal
points out how mistaken they are. Not only do more sheep finally leave the
fold, owing to the confusion which results, but those who remain have to fend
for themselves in order to find the nourishment they need. In any case, such
pastors fail in their mission and make of the Council, whose name they always
have on their lips, a caricature of what it is.
Pastoral Pertains To Shepherds
For the past score of years, the word 'pastoral' has been
commonly used to describe Vatican Council II.
At the opening of that assembly, Pope John XXIII declared: 'We
must follow the norms and needs of a Magisterium that is preeminently pastoral
(11 Oct. 1962). At the Council's close, Pope Paul VI pointed out that: 'The
Vatican Ecumenical Council... has been concerned, before all, with pastoral
needs' (8 Dec. 1965).
It is clear, of course, that 'pastoral' derives from the Latin
word pastor, shepherd. Consequently, when we say that the Church's Magisterium
has a pastoral purpose, we are really saying that the Church's Magisterium
should conduct itself as would a shepherd. But the key question is: to which
shepherd should the Magisterium of the Church conform?
Only One Supreme Good Shepherd
There always were and still are many shepherds in the Catholic
Church, from the pope down to the most recently ordained priest. But, on the
other hand, one recalls that Our Lord spoke in St. John's Gospel of the Good
Shepherd, in the singular, to whom all the sheep are entrusted. But, if there
is only one Good Shepherd, are all the others bad?
St. Augustine faces this conundrum squarely, and explains that,
in fact, there is only one Good Shepherd, the Lord Himself. 'There are not
lacking', he clarifies, 'many good shepherds, but all are found in the person
of the One Shepherd' (Homilies on the Shepherds, 46:29-30).
It immediately flows from this concept that, when we speak of
the Church's pastoral activity, we are perforce speaking of the action of the
Good Shepherd Himself. So, if Vatican Council II and its teachings manifest a
special interest in the pastoral needs of the Church, those called to the
pastoral apostolate must know and follow the mind and will of the real Pastor,
the one Shepherd, the Author of all authentic pastoral plans.
Students of the recent Council who have attempted to evaluate
its results up until now, have sometimes expressed the opinion that there is a
grave danger of the Council being misapplied, and that instead of marking a
second spring for the Church, it will become the occasion for disorders of
every kind.
Christ The Unchangeable, Uncompromising Model of Pastors
This will never happen if the ineluctable relationship between
the real Pastor and the Church's pastoral activity is truly understood and made
operative. St. Paul underlined this important notion when he asked rhetorically
'What then is Apollo? What then is Paul?' (1 Cor. 3-5). As there is but one
High Priest between God and man (Heb. 9:11 ff.), there is only one Good
Shepherd. As all priests share in the one priesthood of Jesus Christ, so all
pastors must seek identity with the Good Shepherd.
We associate pastors are not autonomous but are the arms and
legs and tongues of the Good Shepherd. We are not free to speak with a voice
which is not His, for did not Christ assure the flock that the sheep would
unfailingly recognize the voice of the Good Shepherd? (Jn. 10:4).
Sharing Christ's Pastoral Office
Humanly speaking, it is not always agreeable to share the office
of the Good Shepherd, because the stains of original sin retain in this world
their weakening effect on mankind. The sheep will continue to be attracted by
contaminated pastures and polluted streams, and shepherds will be tempted to
let them roam where they will for fear of incurring hostility. But the shepherd
is gravely mistaken who believes that the duties of his job call for him to win
the applause of the flock rather than to lead and save it.
Neglectful Shepherds
St. Gregory the Great compared a pastor, who neglects
opportunely to admonish his flock for fear of losing favor, to the mercenary of
the parable, condemned by Christ for running away at the approach of the wolf
(Pastoral Rule 2, 4).
To sum up, there is no doubt that the spirit of Vatican Council
II was and remains pastoral, but pastoral in the true sense that its teachings
are those of the unique Pastor, the Good Shepherd whose mission was not to
curry the favor of men. We should carefully recall the occasion on which many
disciples abandoned Jesus because of His 'hard saying' (Jn. 6:10). He did not
change one word of the Gospel in an attempt to become more 'credible' to
listeners of little faith.
Divine Truth Does Not Waver
A modern shepherd who dares to attenuate the doctrine of Jesus
Christ on the pretext of conserving the quantitative presence of non-believers
within the sheepfold, has not understood the pastoral character of Vatican
Council II.
Return to Table of Contents
|